Apply the minimum environmental sustainability requirements where there is a single possible supplier, where a comparable earlier tender drew no suitable bids, or where compliance would cost disproportionately or break technical compatibility.
Contracting authorities and contracting entities must comply, and this is law in force.
Why it matters
This is law in force, not a proposal.
- It is Art. 25(9)-(10), in the Net-Zero Industry Act. as of 2026-08-18
- The act gives its timing as: Applies from 29 June 2024; until 30 June 2026 Art. 25(1) reaches only central purchasing bodies and contracts of EUR 25 million or more (Art. 49(3)). as of 2026-08-18
- It names 4 industries by name: Batteries and solar, Clean tech, Carbon capture and storage and Power. as of 2026-08-18
- Compliance is checked by none, per tender. as of 2026-08-18
The rule
sole supplier, an earlier failed tender within two years, or disproportionate cost -- presumed above a 20% cost difference
Apply the minimum environmental sustainability requirements where there is a single possible supplier, where a comparable earlier tender drew no suitable bids, or where compliance would cost disproportionately or break technical compatibility.
Who is affected
Burden drivers
Source text
Contracting authorities and contracting entities may, on an exceptional basis, decide not to apply paragraphs 1 to 4, where: (a) the required net-zero technology can only be supplied by a specific economic operator and no reasonable alternative or substitute exists and the absence of competition is not the result of an artificial narrowing down of the parameters of the public procurement procedure; (b) no suitable tenders or no suitable requests to participate have been submitted in response to a similar former public procurement procedure launched by the same contracting authority or contracting entity in the two years immediately before the commencement of the planned new procurement procedure; (c) their application would oblige that contracting authority or contracting entity to acquire equipment having disproportionate costs or would result in technical incompatibility in operation and maintenance. 10. Estimated cost differences above 20 %, based on objective and transparent data, may be presumed by contracting authorities and contracting entities to be disproportionate.
View source →